<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Islamic Culture and Relations Organization</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Spektrum Iran</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>0934-358X</Issn>
				<Volume>31</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Early Responses to al-Ḥaira</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Early Responses to al-Ḥaira</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>63</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>71</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">190354</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>DE</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Andrew</FirstName>
					<LastName>J. Newman</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Edinburgh, England</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>15</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Ibn Bābawaih’s al-Faqīh has received much attention by scholars in the field&lt;br /&gt;of Shiʻi studies, especially, Western-language authors. However, his several&lt;br /&gt;other collections of the Imams’ aḥādith have received less attention.&lt;br /&gt;Focusing on Ibn Bābawaih’s Kamāl ad-Din and ʻUyūn Aḫbār ar-Riḍā, texts&lt;br /&gt;assembled in the first suggest that what seem today to be some very basic&lt;br /&gt;points of Twelver Shiʻi doctrine were, in fact, both disputed within the&lt;br /&gt;community and under challenge from other discourses outwith that&lt;br /&gt;community. According to this study, portions of the second (ʻUyūn Aḫbār&lt;br /&gt;ar-Riḍā) suggest that some segments of the community were coming out of&lt;br /&gt;the period of al-Ḥaira addressed by Kamāl.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="DE">Ibn Bābawaih’s al-Faqīh has received much attention by scholars in the field&lt;br /&gt;of Shiʻi studies, especially, Western-language authors. However, his several&lt;br /&gt;other collections of the Imams’ aḥādith have received less attention.&lt;br /&gt;Focusing on Ibn Bābawaih’s Kamāl ad-Din and ʻUyūn Aḫbār ar-Riḍā, texts&lt;br /&gt;assembled in the first suggest that what seem today to be some very basic&lt;br /&gt;points of Twelver Shiʻi doctrine were, in fact, both disputed within the&lt;br /&gt;community and under challenge from other discourses outwith that&lt;br /&gt;community. According to this study, portions of the second (ʻUyūn Aḫbār&lt;br /&gt;ar-Riḍā) suggest that some segments of the community were coming out of&lt;br /&gt;the period of al-Ḥaira addressed by Kamāl.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Aš-Šaiḫ aṣ-Ṣadūq</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Bābawaih’s</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hadith</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">al Kulainī</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Šaiḫ aṭ-Ṭūsī</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Abu Sahl an- Nawbaḫtī</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.spektrumiran.com/article_190354_42d4f6f39a5d93e0e83de1f0a5c9db1a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
